Grief Isn’t a Party Line: On Charlie Kirk, Melissa Hortman, and the Weaponization of Tragedy
As a progressive Christian, I believe every person bears God’s image. That means I start with compassion and tell the truth, even when it’s inconvenient.
- Why I’m writing this
- Start with compassion
- Stop the blame game
- Free speech vs. consequences
- About Melissa Hortman and the double standard
- Where I land
- Sources
Why I’m writing this
The afternoon Charlie Kirk was killed, I was sitting in my recliner scrolling my phone. I didn’t really know him beyond “right-wing activist,” but when the alert came in that he’d been shot, I prayed he would be okay. He wasn’t. And even though I didn’t follow him or agree with him, my first response was compassion—for a person I didn’t know who’d just had his life taken.
Start with compassion
That’s how I feel when anyone is shot at a store, a church, a concert—anywhere. Most of the time we never learn the victims’ politics; we just grieve that people can’t live their daily lives without worrying about gunfire. I don’t fixate on it every time I walk into a store, but the thought has crossed my mind more than once: what if someone opens fire in here?
Stop the blame game
What bothered me after Kirk’s death was how fast some voices rushed to blame “the left.” No. When someone pulls a trigger, that person is responsible. Period. Don’t pin a murder on millions who didn’t do it and would never do it.
I’ve also seen people saying Kirk held vile or racist views. I think a lot of his rhetoric was ugly. That’s part of the record he chose for himself. Does that mean I think he should have been shot? No. Does it mean I’m going to pretend he never said any of it because he was murdered? Also no. Two things can be true at once: his killing was wrong, and his rhetoric did harm.
Free speech vs. consequences
In the days after the assassination, prominent Republicans—including the sitting vice president—urged Americans to report people to their employers if they posted something “disrespectful” about Kirk. Some folks were fired or suspended as a result. Legally, private employers often can discipline staff for off-duty speech. But let’s be honest about what this campaign is: a political loyalty test dressed up as “decency.” If you want a culture that rejects political violence, you don’t build it by policing grief, irony, or criticism—even when the criticism quotes Kirk’s own words about guns.
About Melissa Hortman and the double standard
If we’re going to talk about consistency, then let’s actually be consistent. In June, Minnesota House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were murdered in their home. That same night, State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were shot at their home and survived. Federal charges followed. When asked why he didn’t lower flags for Hortman, the president said he wasn’t asked—then turned around and quickly ordered flags at half-staff for Kirk. Maybe you accept that explanation; maybe you don’t. Either way, the split-screen is hard to ignore.
Flag-lowering facts: On September 15, 2025, President Trump said he would have lowered flags for Minnesota’s Melissa Hortman if Gov. Tim Walz had asked (AP News; Star Tribune). For Charlie Kirk, no request was needed; on September 10 the White House issued a national proclamation ordering flags at half-staff through September 14 (White House proclamation).
Where I land
Charlie Kirk’s killing is, in moral terms, no different from any other gun murder. Someone decided to end a life. That choice belongs to the shooter. Don’t blame “the left.” Don’t blame “the right.” Blame the man who pulled the trigger. Grieve the life lost. And then, instead of using the blood to score points, do the grown-up work of reducing the violence that keeps wrecking families—no matter whose yard sign is on their lawn.
Sources
- Associated Press: Charges filed in the killing of Charlie Kirk; prosecutors outline counts and potential penalties
- Washington Post: Suspect appears in court; prosecutors will seek the death penalty
- ABC News: Officials say suspect targeted Kirk because he “spreads too much hate”
- White House: Proclamation ordering flags at half-staff for Charlie Kirk
- AP News: President says he would have lowered flags for Melissa Hortman “if asked”
- Star Tribune: Coverage of the flag-lowering controversy and timeline
- U.S. DOJ (Office of Public Affairs): Federal complaint in the Minnesota lawmakers case
- U.S. DOJ (District of Minnesota): Federal indictment in the Hortman murders and related shootings
- MPR News: Hennepin County grand jury returns first-degree murder indictment
- FactCheck.org: Context for quotes attributed to Charlie Kirk; confirms 2023 “some gun deaths” remark
- Newsweek (Apr. 6, 2023): Report on Kirk’s 2023 comments about gun deaths and the Second Amendment
- AP News: Republicans (including the vice president) push to report and punish posts about Kirk’s killing; workplace firings
- POLITICO: Sen. Ted Cruz says the First Amendment “absolutely protects hate speech,” while noting possible job consequences
- Reuters: Prosecutors to seek death penalty; new details on alleged confession texts
- AP News: Prosecutor says suspect left a note and later confessed in texts
- Utah County Attorney: News conference alert on formal charges
- ABC News: Visual timeline of how the UVU shooting unfolded
Editor’s note: This post reflects information available as of September 16, 2025. Charges and case details may change as new filings and hearings occur.